If you don't use it, you can in fact lose it
In an effort to reach my goal of doubling the amount of photos I take in 2006, I went to a local women's hockey game last night to give my "trigger finger" a workout. (For those who don't know, I like to call myself a sports photographer. In my next life, that's what I'm going to do.)
First off, I'd like to take a moment to discuss women's hockey. For the first time in my life, I went to a hockey game where I saw a penalty called - for BODY CHECKING. I played in a men's D league for a few years. It's not non-contact, but there is no real checking allowed. Years of doing that, I never saw a BODY CHECKING penalty called. Don't get me wrong, I'm not a fan of overly physical hockey. It's a much more exciting game when players are allowed to show their skill. But no checking? That's not hockey.
Anyway, back to photography. It was not quite like riding a bike. I was slow to react, I was not anticipating the play properly, and I was downright unlucky. Exhibit A:

Trust me, that was a great play in front of the net.
Exhibit B will take a little explanation. When shooting sports for publication, you're supposed to occasionally take pictures of the scoreboard. This helps give you an idea of what point in the game that photos were taken, what the score is, etc. In this case, the scoreboard also showed the name of the person who scored. It was all set up perfectly. The one catch is the incandescent bulbs in the scoreboard. The light they emit goes on and off very rapidly, faster than the eye can detect. NOT faster than a camera shutter at 1/400th of a second can detect, apparently. (The first photo below is how the scoreboard is supposed to look. The second is how it looked 3 of the 5 times I tried to photograph it.)


Overall, it wasn't bad. Sports Illustrated won't be calling anytime soon, but I had a good time. For those interested, I posted the handful of shots I liked (of the 200+ I took) here.



Comments
cadiz12 said:
that's okay, omar, practice makes perfect. besides, our teacher always told us that for sports photography, if you saw it, you missed it. i guess that doesn't really count with digital, though.
Radioactive Puck said:
Dude! Those are some great shots. And the linked ones are pretty good, too. I guess.
(Kidding. Despite what Omar implies here the linked photos *are* SI caliber. Clearly the man has talent.)
seventeen syllables said:
Those are some great action shots in front of the net, Omar. I particularly like the one with the spray of snow from someone's skate jetting into the air.
I used to play hockey --very badly I might add--before I got pregnant w/my son and I always wished we were allowed to check. I think that would've fit my skillset better than, say, scoring goals, or passing accurately.
I said:
cadiz - No, that's still good advice. Digital SLRs work the same way as film cameras in that regard. Sadly, I saw lots of action, and didn't see a lot of referees' butts.
RaJ - Thanks! I do have a handful more of the ref butt/back shots, I can create a new gallery of just those.
Dr. 17 - Passing accurately wasn't my thing as a hockey player either. It's overrated, as far as I'm concerned.
Katie said:
I'd give you some advice, but I'm no photographer, sometimes I pretend to be, but I'm not. Anyways, your pictures are better than I caould do.
demosthenes said:
The NHL is back, and I'm sure they're looking for photographers. I mean, with the Wings gearing up for another season of unprecedented dominance, it's not as though they need really good photos... they're all going to be the same: Goal, goal, goal, fight, goal, goal, fight, goal, goal, overtime, shootout, goal, goal, goal, fight, goal, goal.
Ah, I love the new rules.
Glo said:
What's the point of hockey if it isn't overly violent?!
Rock on, girls.
P.s. Good shots, Omar.
Glo said:
Omar is lost. He cannot be found anywhere. By anywhere, I am very specifically meaning my reality. It's the only one that really matters :)
a Sheltered Town said:
Hilarious.
Although the humour shots are well, humorous, the others look good. I didn't think women's hockey could look so entertaining. Good job.