CATS: A Jellicle Review
I'll be the first to admit, I'm no regular theater-goer. I may have seen, on average, one play/musical on stage per year over the past 10 years. It's not because I don't enjoy it, because I usually do. I just rarely find myself thinking that a particular play is a "must see."
This year, my parents are hosting an exchange student. She was in the local high school's big spring production of CATS. The high school typically puts together some good productions, and the kids are usually very talented. This year's kids were no exception, they could sing and dance like pros.
However, I was a bit surprised by the show itself. All I knew going in is that it had run on Broadway for 15+ years. I had never seen it, nobody had ever told me the storyline. After seeing it, I now know why nobody told me the storyline. There is no storyline. I'm no artist, but shouldn't plays/musicals have plots? Dialog? Character development? I did some additional reading on it, and learned that the play itself is an adaptation of a bunch of individual poems. Basically, the common theme is that the poems all have to do with cats. THAT is what ties it all together. That's it.
Needless to say, I left the theater feeling a bit dissatisfied. The worst part about it is that 5 days later, I still can't get it out of my head. I can't stop thinking about how this horrible horrible play lasted so long on Broadway and elsewhere. I can't stop trying to estimate the amount of dollars generated by it. I WANT to stop, but I can't. Oh, and there are three songs from it that are stuck in my head also. This is pretty common with show tunes, but usually, I don't hate the show that the songs are attached to, so it's worse this time. The wife feels the same way. In her words, "I feel like I've been scarred. I can never get my pre-CATS life back."
Maybe that's how it lasted so long. It's like an infection, a virus. (Not a good kind of virus, like The Indie Virus that I've recently contracted.) This is the bad kind. I'd put CATS somewhere between syphilis and herpes. There's no cure, so it's worse than syphilis. But you're always very aware that you're infected by it, so it's not as bad as the commercials say herpes is.
So if you like your plays to have plots, skip this one. If you're all artsy and like free-flowing incongruously written shows that have no storylines, lots of nonsense songs, and some made up words, stop hugging that tree and go see CATS.



Comments
Radioactive Color said:
Well sports fans, Omar's on a ROLL this time. He's smashed his way through a crowd of Broadway musical lovers and - get this - his wife tore through the hole with him, it was that big. Wait-- OH! He nailed the TREE HUGGERS too! The man is ON FIRE!
I said:
Did I go over the top a little bit with the syphilis/herpes comparison? Perhaps. But I'm not sorry. Now excuse me while I sing.
... oh well, I never! Was there ever a cat so clever as magical Mr. Mistoffelees...
zoe said:
would have to agree with you on this one - even though i tend to be one of the artsy types...but with this particular play, i like to pretend that i never saw it... people ask (yes this is something people would ask me) "have you seen CATS -the musical" and i just can't bring myself to admit the horrible truth - i sat through the overly long production. so i lie and slowly but surely its just like i've never seen it-i'm beginning to believe my own lie!
thats my advise to you - pretend it never happened...other than when the exchange student asks you about it -
I said:
If I'm not mistaken, Zoe, this may be the first time in 15 (ish) years that we've agreed about something.
cadiz12 said:
cats scare me in general, but this show is really unnerving, what with all the leotards/writhing going on. i happened to catch some of it on PBS one time and i had to change the channel. however, some of the songs are pretty catchy. i like 'memory.'
it's funny, i just saw that woody allen musical, 'everyone says i love you' last night. i was expecting it to be bad, but i was pleasantly surprised at the musical talent of some actors i had already respected, like Ed Norton and Tim Roth. and as i suspected, Drew Barrymore had to have someone sing for her. and goldie hawn has a nice voice. julia roberts still walks like a duck.
one of the lines at the end was something to the effect of 'if you want this story to be even remotely believeable, you're going to need to make it a musical.' maybe that's what ALW was thinking about 'Cats,' too.
Katie said:
I liked Cats when I was five. But that's not saying much... thankfully, my tastes have grown up a bit. And seriously, you go once a year? I haven't seen a show (like a musical, or play... what-have-you) in a very, very long time.
Lia said:
I never felt the need to see Cats, for exactly the reason you state. I like there to be at least some sort of point to the exercise.
Give me Les Mis any day.
Syar said:
I never noticed the absence of storyline. the play came to malaysia once, and all anyone was talking about was Cats and andrew lloyd webber and broadway.
nobody once mentioned what it was about. I can barely stand songs with no lyrics or movies with frequent 5 minute shots of people walking (Elephant) so I'm glad I skipped this one.
Nadia said:
But hello, John Robinson was SO worth the walking shots.
Carol said:
I was hunting down reviews for a friend of mine who's deciding whether or not to go, when I found your comments. I always thought I was a freak for hating it when I saw it on Broadway years ago. I feel better now! Thanks Omar and everyone else who, of course, NEVER saw Cats. ;o)