Proof is in the Eyes
We're on one of those local Freecycle mailing lists, where people post stuff that they want to give away. It warms my little former-finance-major heart to find ways to not spend money on things. Additionally, I've seen the boy play with enough cardboard boxes to know that he doesn't need expensive stuff to be happy. On the list we saw a small box of old "Wild Animal Baby" books, published by the National Wildlife Foundation.

The boy loves books and loves animals, so this was a no-brainer. We got the books, and quickly put them into our regular rotation.
On the back of each of the books, there is a picture with a letter of the alphabet, along with an animal whose name begins with that letter. Also, there is a child's face on a hand-drawn body, but I find that combination often looks kind of creepy, so I'm not going to talk much about that. Most of the images look something like this:

So anyway, one day, I'm reading through one of them, when I hear my wife gasp and then stifle laughter. When I asked what was the matter, she pointed to the back of the book I was reading:

We only got about 8 or 10 of these books, and OF COURSE one of them has to have a vole on the back. After I got over my initial disbelief, I really looked closer at the picture. I know the A is for Armadillo image might be kind of small, but you can see how the armadillo is just walking along going about his business. When I look at the other books, most of the pictures are just like that: they show the animals walking around, going about their business. Then I looked again at the vole image.

You guys thought I was kidding when I wrote about them being evil? Well here's proof that I wasn't, straight from the National Wildlife Foundation. That vole isn't peacefully walking around, it's looking right in your eyes with an "I could kill you at any given moment" look.
I only pray that James F. Gatto made it out of there OK.



Comments
Jon said:
If my forensic instincts are correct, I think the photographer is about to meet his demise. Notice the water rings in the larger photo. I believe the vole has just spit at him, the universal vole signal for, “Now you gonnna die!” But perhaps that gave young James enough time to escape…
cadiz12 said:
poor james, if he DID escape, i'm sure he's scarred for life.
elasticwaistbandlady said:
The Mom in me is screaming out to the child in this picture with his hand hovering precariously close to the offending creature, "Don't touch that Vole or you'll catch Omar Phillips disease for sure!" Little James will go on to spend days and nights obsessively hunting Vole. He will be likened unto a modern day crazed Captain Ahab.
Rhonda said:
If James loses that hand, they can just draw him a new one.
Besides, that little vole isn't mad at James, he's looking at YOU, the guy with the creamy peanut butter and the mouse trap.
glo said:
Consider the mystery of why they had to draw on the kids' bodies solved.
OR
Consider this proof that the vole is just misunderstood. The armadillo was all shades of unfriendly, but the vole looked like he really cared about our friendship.
Lia said:
Beady little eyes. Aaaaaaaaaah!
Lianne said:
You get what you pay for.
:)
wendela said:
I was on that freecycle list for a while, but never saw anything better than a "used rabbit cage, needs cleaning" (yuk).
I think there was a typo in the name of the boy with the vole. Little James made it out fine after all. His last name ended with an i instead of o. I'd guess the vole is now history.
Syar said:
Notice genuine happiness on Armadillo Girl's face. Now, notice the restrained terror on James' face.
Damn that vole.